16 october

Prohibition on the disposal of assets

Versino Financial Suite

That Prohibition on the disposal of assets (also prohibition of offsetting) is prohibited under § 246, paragraph 2 of the German Commercial Code (HGB), to offset items on the asset side with items on the liability side and expenses with income. Therefore, a company must present receivables and liabilities separately.

Background

The prohibition on aggregation is part of the principle of clarity and transparency. A knowledgeable third party should be able to quickly get an overview of the company’s situation based on the books. This prohibition ensures an unedited annual financial statement. Therefore, the gross principle applies to the profit and loss account (GuV); the net principle is prohibited. For example, a company may not account rental income for rental expenses and only report the surplus. Otherwise, the reader of the GuV would never know that there were also rental expenses.

Special cases

Professional sources cite cases where positions are charged. Capital companies are not allowed to show value adjustments on the liability side. Therefore, they account for the value adjustments in the closing balance sheet using the account “Accounts payable”. In the consolidated financial statements, the debt consolidation is calculated by comparing the debts and liabilities of the company because an entity cannot have any debts or liabilities towards itself. However, under the BilMoG, latent taxes on the liability and the asset side are not allowed to be offset with each other: they must not be settled together.

In SAP Business One

SAP Business One works with separate reconciliation accounts for receivables (debitors) and payables (creditors). According to the contribution, this separation is intended to be commercially legal.

Link to the post

The contribution limits the clearing prohibition to operational netting: According to its author, the prohibition concerns the balance sheet statement, not the operational payment settlement. If both parties agree and the settlement is properly booked, operational netting is permissible under the contribution. This classification is a statement in the contribution.

Demarcation

Related entries: Setoff, Netting (Versino Financial Suite).


 

SPRINT & SWIRL

Sprint and Swirl: How an AI agent divides work and learns from trials

This series deals with artificial intelligence in conjunction with SAP Business One. It takes a close look at fundamental AI principles...
LATS

LATS: Considering several paths simultaneously with AI — and the availability check in SAP B1

This series focuses on artificial intelligence in conjunction with SAP Business One. Not as a collection of product announcements, but as...
ReAct and RLEF

ReAct and RLEF: How Artificial Intelligence Learns from Real Mistakes — and What Automated Bank Reconciliation in SAP Business One Has to Do with It

This is the fourth instalment in a series on this blog dealing with AI fundamentals in conjunction with SAP Business One...
Service Layer AI as a transactional layer

SAP B1 10.0 FP2608: Service Layer AI as a transactional layer

The SAP Business One Service Layer has previously served predominantly as a passive data provider: applications requested data via OData, each ...
Process Reward Model

Process Reward Models: Why a correct result does not yet prove a correct method

This series continuously examines individual AI basic terms and methods such as the Process Reward Model. The previous episode has ...
Test-Time-Compute-Scaling

Test-Time Compute Scaling: Why a Smaller AI Model Can End Up Winning — and What Supplier Comparison in SAP Business One Has to Do With It

This is a continuation of the series on this blog, which deals with Artificial Intelligence in combination with SAP Business One...
Wird geladen …