The adaptability of ERP systems is usually a sign of quality. And rightly so, because ultimately the software should support each company individually. During our numerous ERP implementations, we have repeatedly realised that many established processes are not efficient. However, most companies still prefer to follow tried and tested paths rather than venture into unknown territory. At least then you know that nothing worse will happen. A big mistake, especially when it comes to process optimisation. And that's usually what an ERP project is all about. For the introduction of an Risk factor.
Apparent control creates actual time robbers
What no longer stands out after a long time are processes that are really only about curating or managing tasks. These seem valuable in the process chain as they convey a sense of control. In reality, however, they are simply time wasters. Instead of clearly distributing tasks and enabling fast and effective completion through efficient data management, files are simply pushed from A to B and in the end nobody knows what the current status of the task is.
In order to avoid this, it would be sensible even before the actual ERP implementation, an accurate process analysis and to check processes to see whether they actually fulfil their purpose. Here are ERP consultant as we are a very helpful point of contact, as we know what is possible in the area of data management, for example. In accounting, for example, many Automated processes become.
It is also helpful at this point to ask employees where their work takes the most time or comes to a standstill. These are often the points where an ERP solution can add a little oil to the gears. This can quickly lead to noticeable improvements. It also has the pleasant side effect that employees are involved in the process changeover and that even the most habitual of employees can understand the changes. However, you should always accompany these changes with training.
Flexible system with a deep tendency towards standardisation
Through these steps, the areas can be clearly worked out into the processes that must adapt to the system and the processes that the system must integrate. A good ERP system must therefore make both possible. Suggest good and proven tools, but also be flexible enough to adapt to existing processes. Standard solutions in particular, such as SAP Business One have the advantage that they combine the basics in the basic version, but offer a variety of tools and applications that can be integrated. This is certainly not the click-and-buy option, but that's not what a new ERP system should be about. The ERP system can be a great opportunity to scrutinise existing processes and consider options.
more on the subject:
Standard ERP: Advantages and disadvantages
The standard usability of ERP systems in 9 points
ERP as standard - what does that mean?
Integrated ERP approach or special software for financial management?
Standard still trendy
